Bombshell Secret Documents Show Monsanto Knew About Glyphosate Cancer Link Over 35 Years Ago… – Eco Snippets

Bombshell Secret Documents Show Monsanto Knew About Glyphosate Cancer Link Over 35 Years Ago…

Bombshell Secret Documents Show Monsanto Knew About Glyphosate Cancer Link Over 35 Years Ago...

Backyard Solar Power Revolution...

Monsanto have come under more pressure recently after the WHO defined the main ingredient in their popular weedkiller ‘Roundup’ as a ‘probably human carcinogen’.

They are still trying to pick up the pieces from the PR disaster, but it turns out Monsanto may have been aware of the link between glyphosate and cancer for up 35 years.

Research Scientist Dr. Anthony Samsel has studies the effects on glyphosate on the human body for years, and has revealed the harmfulness of its nature. He has worked with a Dr. Stephanie Seneff, who released the warning that as many as half of all US children could be autistic by 2025 (in large part due to glyphosate exposure).

Samsel was recently able to get a look inside a file, sealed away since 1981 as a “Trade Secret” at the request of the Monsanto Company due to his field of study, and although he is not allowed to reveal the file to anyone, he is allowed to talk his thoughts on what he found, that is what might be a massive cancer cover-up that has been going on for decades.

Journalist Tony Mitra interviews Samsel in the video below about what he found. He talks of shocking evidence that showed “significant incidences of cell tumors of the tests and tumor growth in multiple organs and tissues” in lab animals.

He talks about evidence that glyphosate enters bone marrow almost immediately, which prevents the formation of new cells in living organisms.

Samsel also highlights a higher incidence of adenomas (benign tumors) and carcinomas (cancerous tumors that begin in outer tissues) is almost every single case.

In the video he says how he believes glyphosate should be considered an “unequivocal” carcinogen, rather than a “probable” one.

Watch the video and hear what Samsel has to say about the secret file:

Via Organic & Healthy. If you like this idea, be sure to share it with your friends and inspire someone you know. Anything becomes possible with just a little inspiration…

See Also...


How To Grow A More Productive Veggie Garden...
How To Turn The Food I Grow Into Healthy Hearty Meals...
How To Keep Chickens, Rabbits & Other Livestock...
How To Turn Herbs Into Natural Health & Wellness...
How To Become More Self Sufficient In General...

Recommended Reading...


Gardening: No Need For Chemical Fertlizers. Plants Grown In This Organic Medium Grow 3 Times Faster Than In Soil Alone. Read More Here...
Off Grid & Solar: MIT Device Cuts Power Bills By 65%. A New Discovery From MIT Is Taking The Energy World By Storm. Watch The Video Here To See How It Works. Read More Here...
Gardening: Growing Vegies In Straw? Ditch The Dirt! Here Are 7 Smart Reasons To Grow Your Vegies In A Straw Bale Garden. Read More Here...
Skills & Crafts: These Are The Self Sufficiency Skills Our Great Grandparents Used Around The House That You Can Do Too, To Be More Independent & Make Life Easier. Read More Here...
Plants & Remedies: A Comprehensive List Of Common Backyard Weeds That Can Help You Replace The Drugs In Your Medicine Cabinet & How To Use Them. Read More Here...

Gardening & Self Sufficiency Lifestyle Tips!

Join over 220,000 people that get our organic gardening & self sufficiency lifestyle tips via email. Simply enter your name and best email address below and click the "Get Instant Access" Button now...

Leave a Comment:

(198) comments

these guys supplied the gas in ww 2 and dioxin in vietnam and 245t and on and on and on – they are truly evil

Reply

Have you fact checked his claims before you decided to post this?

My guess is no. Because if you had you would have known it’s bullshit.

Please stop misinformation.

Reply

    So the link between Glyphosate and Cancer is BS … sure it is … NOT

    Reply

    Just like the cigarette companies knew about cancer. How hard is that to fathom.

    Reply

    Your correct Ecosnippets rarely does fact checks. There is no evidence this is purely hearsay. “Probable” is not a direct link in the real science world.

    Reply

    sorry, but the links between glyphosate and cancer, along with a myriad of other health issues, gets stronger every day.

    Reply

    ever heard of the precautionary principle?

    Reply

    Ok please provide scientific evidence …

    So far it’s one of the most tested pesticides and have been shown to be the safest when used properly

    Reply

    Claus Jensen these people don’t want to accept things like facts. It’s been lowered in probability of causing cancer other than by psuedo science quacks. Well done or slightly burnt food is more likely to cause you cancer or driving in traffic. I love it when a person talks about all this GMO stuff causing cancer then goes and has a smoke lol.

    Reply

Caffeine is one of the most deadliest natural pesticides yet we still eat plants products that have it.

Reply

    Caffeine is perfectly fine for us in moderation. However, even a dog can easily die from it . Humans can overdose from it and can die from the overdose though death is rare. I’ve overdosed on caffeine out of pure youth and stupidity. A human can also completely overcome any addiction to caffeine within 3 days of abstinence.

    Reply

    Caffeine if applied as an insecticide in its natural form is far deadlier then Roundup The LD50 dosage of caffeine is 150 mg/kg. Roundup is around 4000 mg/kg. These are pure forms not diluted. You could consume 200 mg/kg/day straight roundup and still have no effect. Not saying you wouldn’t be puking your guts up.

    Reply

right where do you work, fact check my ass it causes cancer we know that and the bastards don’t even have to label it

Reply

This would explain a lot

Reply

Never trust a company that only has testing done by its own scientists. They choose what’s published, and what’s NOT.

Reply

Last I checked which was last week Glyphosate is perfectly safe. It got moved from class C to class E in probability a long time ago so it lost probability.

Reply

Monsanto needs to go away !

Reply

Other things on the probable cause cancer list the Ecosnippet or another activist site will not put on.
Any hot beverage
Styrofoam
Plastic
Working shifts
Going to the hair dresser or barbershop
Some known Carcinogenic items:
Wood dust
The sun
Any alcoholic beverage
So guess what people there are other things out there that you have more exposure to then roundup that will cause cancer. Why isn’t Ecosnippet discussing them.

Reply

    Who do you work for?

    Reply

    Construction company as a Environmental Engineer and Manager 20 years o environmental resource management .

    Reply

    Hia John – we lost our farm manager to leukaemia a few years ago after he started doing a lot of blackberry spraying – he was very healthy before that. Didn’t drink, smoke or do any drugs, etc., and was a vego mostly. I have stopped using that Garlon and Roundup stuff many years ago and feel great at 68. I know a lot of sickly people who use Roundup, etc., around here. In the North of NSW where the banana plantations are heavily sprayed by law, there is the highest level for population of intellectually handicapped children in daytime care. Local carers in the field gave me those figures thirty years ago.

    Reply

    Kay Schieren According to four sources I looked at including Leukemia. Number one genetics and number two long exposure to radiation including the sun. Leukemia Society doesn’t recognize the ingredients in round up as the cause. Leukemia was diagnosed in 1845 for the first time it’s believe to have been around since the first man. There are also many causing for intellectually handicapped children including lead poisoning from paints from back in the 70’s and early 80’s. That’s about thirty years. My point is there are thousands of things that can cause cancer man made, genetics, and natural. Everyone focusing on one item because a pair of quacks say so is insane. There have been thousands of studies by third parties nothing has come up. Roundup is a scapegoat you’re not truly finding the cause or the cure.

    Reply

    John Baker It’s like cancer is 25 percent environment and 75 genetics or something. Don’t get me wrong if you expose yourself daily to a chronic and acute poison you’ll likely get cancer IF you are dumb and get it on you constantly. One of my former jobs people were getting cancer a lot. It was literally Jet Fuel. But only people that got it on them repeatedly because their skin absorbed it and also you can breathe in the fumes or if real dumb you can also ingest it by not washing your hands or accidentally swallowing it.

    Reply

    Bob Mhidden I agree a good friend of mine died from working in the ship yards in Philly from Asbestosis. So I’m well aware things cause cancer. My grandfather had melanoma from being exposed to the sun from construction work. But there is no proof here except two guys that have been exposed to use faulty test methods constantly, to get money to sell their books.

    Reply

Monsanto is a scourge on the planet.

Reply

We have no control over the use of Roundup except on our own properties. Glyphosates are contaminating our foods, especially root crops.

Reply

    What about the pesticides approved for organic farming?

    Reply

    Organic pesticides are more deadly.

    Reply

Of course they did! Why is everyone so surprised. Their company is just run by bad people Who only care about the almighty dollar.

Reply

    Because the organic industry works for free and aint greedy at all

    Reply

This is a surprise why. The government continues to allow chemicals in most food products without any concern to people.

Reply

    Name something that you eat, that isn’t made of chemicals 🙂

    Reply

Robin Limb what would you say to this .

Reply

Its kind of funny how Ecosnippet quotes two of the biggest quakes in science. Every single one of their reports and journals have been proven wrong yet Ecosnippet keeps using them. Your more likely to get cancer just spending time in the sun then your are from glyphosate. Amazing how gullible people are.

Reply

    people are gullible and you are one of them… prone to chemical propaganda…. yhea round up is less lethal than sun ? you really got it right Mr enviromental engineer….

    Reply

    Davide Calamia actually do some research before opening your month. The sun is the leading cause of cancer in the world. This you can find from sources like the American Cancer society. Glyphosate is listed as probable but no studies on humans to prove. Sorry to bust the bubble of an activist with no science back ground.

    Reply

OF COURSE they did. They just didn’t give a crap.

Reply

Of course. Where have you been?

Reply

Monsanto is a killer.

Reply

It’s no secret at all that glyphosate is a class 2A carcinogen. Yet what ends on our food is literally to no concern.

Reply

    This is based on studies with rats that where prone to have cancer. You better live in a cave because the sun is a class 1.

    Reply

    John Baker I’m totally on your side, I meant “of no concern”.

    Reply

If only we could sue them out of existence.

Reply

Yeap, it’s right there in the IARC’s Group 2A. Alongside shit like fumes from frying, being a hairdresser, red meat, beverages over 65 degrees Celsius and indoor emissions from firewood.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_IARC_Group_2A_carcinogens

Reply

Why am I not surprised? Where money/greed is concerned, ethics and morals go out the window…

Reply

NO!!! Shocking!

Reply

Arthur Kirkland

Reply

Wow. How surprising is THAT?!?!

Reply

I’m not sure that’s a bombshell – I have no doubt about that!

Reply

Next it will be 1080 and brodifacoum that turns out to be carcinogenic

Reply

so they kill people for profit

Reply

Of course they did…
No different than big tobacco.

Reply

No good reasoning with these killers thay are immune to prosecution probably like Big Pharma !!

Reply

What the heck are you on? Of course it’s carcinogenic, just like the pesticides on your organic crops but what’s left on the end product is more than fine to consume.
The WHO states pretty clearly on their website, in what group of carcinogen each pesticide is

Reply

But Toffa , I do not use pesticides or chemical fertilizers . I use worm tea made from my own worm castings ;). Makes for bigger crops and smiley faces on my friends who know why :).

Reply

Yeah, 2A category. Like the emissions of firewood, consumption of red meat, emissions from frying food, beverages hotter than 65C, and the occupational hazard of working as a hairdresser.

This really isn’t the “gotcha” you’re looking for. Hate Monsanto for being a corporation by all means, but they’ve since long lost their patent on glyphosate, and they’re nowhere near as big as the annual earnings of Big Organic.

Reply

    Well put, I will be quoting you in future.

    Reply

    Shills here, shills there, shills, shills everywhere.

    Reply

    Joyce Ann Still wondering where my shillbux are. Any idea where I’m meant to turn in order to cash in on defending basic science?

    Reply

    But Joyce Ann HAS to be right, she has a flag.
    ?

    Reply

    Earnings have nothing to do with it. Why even bring it up?

    Reply

    Don Matthews Because it’s one of the chief complaints by the anti-GMO/glyphosate crowd – the cash made by corporations on the technology, while they choose to completely ignore how much Whole Foods or what have you rake in each year on their gullibility.

    Reply

If they keep expanding the diagnosed autism spectrum (which is the trend instead of actually understanding it), all children will be labeled autistic by 2035.

Reply

The half-life of glyphosate in soil ranges between 2 and 197 days; a typical field half-life of 47 days has been suggested. Soil and climate conditions affect glyphosate’s persistence in soil. The median half-life of glyphosate in water varies from a few to 91 days.

Reply

“Glyphosate is safe!” just as “DDT is safe!!” and “PCBs are safe!” or from a slightly different group with the same sort of public relations tactics, “Tobacco is safe!” or the first one I was aware of from big Pharma, “Thalidomide for pregnant women is safe!!” Lots more examples but those do for a start.

All of them screaming loud and clear that anyone saying anything different was pretty much an idiot. Although it turned out the idiots were the people who believed them after being told the truth.

Reply

    So stop eating. Ld50 of caffeine is 150mg/kg and glyphosate is 1538 mg/kg in mice so what’s actually more dangerous

    Reply

And, Disney was backing them all the way.

Reply

I love how Ecosnippet gets data from two of the biggest quacks in science. There data, science, and techniques have been proven to be total inaccurate and false. A big thumbs up to Ecosnippet’s for terrible journalism.

Reply

The sun is a known carcinogen maybe we should all hid in caves.

Reply

Why would you be surprised? Corporate profits and interests will always come before any negative issues. Monsanto is the prime example of this. So what’s going to be done? Nothing, of course. The corporation will buy it’s way out of scandal and lawsuits as per usual.

Reply

It’s not a bombshell. We all know that they have lied since the beginning. God will repay those evil deceivers.

Reply

Well, what a surprise.

Reply

then why is it still on the market

Reply

Publish the secret documents…

Reply

It sounds like a global suite against them now. they will die. just 1 million for each person who has consumed food for more than a year

Reply

You can’t kill weeds and not affect people. Not possible!

Reply

Corrupt Satanist Paedophile Globalist Politicians, and their zombie control center Corporate News,. , worldwide,.are KILLING all Divine Carbon Based Humans… and stealing the children for their paedophile sex slave ring,..
VACCINATION ACTIVATED, glyphosate encapsulated Mitochondria diseases,, ETC…
. Considering everything,.. … it is time to Burn these Corporations to the Ground,.. Corporate Media News, Oil, Pharma, Monsanto, Bayer, Dupont,. they intend to rape and kill, you and the Earth,..
They have poisoned all the water,,Poisoned the food, ,Poisoned the air, banned natural cures, made mandatory vaccines/poisoning/A.I. nano implants.,.spend all money on bombs,.Reduced the oxygen level, humans need, banned hemp, cut forest, which eat co2, and poison, and make oxygen,..VACCINATION ACTIVATED Diseases,glyphosate encapsulated Mitochondria, ETC…Everyone is sick of being slaves of Satan

Reply

Yep, it shares the same carcinogenic classification as sausages and sawdust…really bad stuff..*smh* One source, but you could try any of the agencies listed on the page for more info.
http://www.glyphosate.eu/no-cancer-risk-and-lots-environmental-benefits-scientific-facts-favour-re-approval-glyphosate

Reply

More BS news from Ecosnippet spreading lies once again. There source a person who has been discredited so many times no scientific journal will except is work.???

Reply

Anyone notice that it’s always anti Monsanto yet the ingredient in weed killer (glysophate) is used in every weed killer spray but hundreds of different companies . It’s like only Monsanto is killing us lol . I myself just by glysophate as a product . No need for a fancy brand name .

Reply

Residual Pesticides risk is about a much of a risk as one glass of wine every seven years. 1 ? every 7 years. Yes you can kill weeds and not affect people.

Reply

    If only someone had done some studies to prove that theory

    Reply

    Dan Johnstone there has been a study done, it’s not a theory. You are just intellectually lazy. https://geneticliteracyproject.org/2018/01/09/study-pesticide-residue-food-risky-one-glass-wine-every-7-years/

    Reply

    Bob Mhidden so sad you are actually defending one of the most toxic companies in the world and then calling others ingellectully lazy. Shame how your freedom has been wasted.

    Reply

    Bob Mhidden who paid for the study???

    Reply

    Mo Moshiri haha one of the most toxic companies, you do realize their are companies that make toxins intentionally right? You are the poster child of anti-intellectual. There’s no shame on how my freedom, projecting much?

    Reply

    Bob I really don’t care to convince you. Just sad for you.

    Reply

    Trisha Spinelli there’s a link to the study in the article you can find out from there. Similar studies though and 3rd party testing have proved pesticides in low doses don’t harm humans.

    Reply

    Mo Moshiri your incorrect I don’t care to convince your ignorant opinion either, I’m stating facts not feelings.

    Reply

    Your facts are laughable but I reckon you will learn soon enough.

    Reply

    Mo Moshiri no they aren’t I have a study and can find others. Even the Government knows it’s safe for you. You have nothing but nonsense and fear mongering propaganda.

    Reply

    Cool man. Good luck with that.

    Reply

    Bob Bob Bob, then I so wonder why so many countries are banning Monsanto and more doing so by the month, and please don’t tell me they ignorant, they have brilliant scientists who prove that Monsanto is bad news. You sound like a Palestinian trying to claim Israel belongs to them. Keep on dreaming.

    Reply

    Selwyn Lloyd we are talking pesticides not GMO’s which are what are banned in those countries. You don’t even know what you are talking about. They are ignorant for banning them btw. Science has proven organic and GMO’s are no different health wise. European scientists have even wrote letters in support of GMOs and Monsanto. Kale and Broccoli and many other plants all come from the same plant if it weren’t for genetic modification. No one is eating organic.

    Reply

    Bob Mhidden you are very literal when you say gmo. Surely you would have to admit that interspecies genetic modification would never happen and is not on par with breeding by pollination techniques.

    Reply

    Bob Mhidden the study is interesting. I like that it takes into account lots of trace amounts. I haven’t gotten to the part where they say how they know what levels effect people and how. I stopped when they mentioned animal products were not included as they don’t contain any pesticides. I am a sheep farmer not a scientist but I find that statement hard to swallow. Organophosphate used as sheep dip is very persistent in the environment, how it would not be in the sheep when it is used externally and kills parasites inside the sheep baffles me. Maybe I am again ignorant as you did produce exactly the study i didn’t think existed lol.

    Reply

    Mo Moshiri He is probably a monsatan shill, you can’t argue with them. Money is what drives them.

    Reply

    Dan Johnstone yeah I am extremely literal, either a flaw or quality depending lol. Glad you are actually interested and intelligent to read it.

    I am not specialized or an expert enough to know if that genetic modification would have happened but I can certainly admit not to the degree we humans have with our husbandry and labs (etc) today. We also wouldn’t have corn, broccoli, kale and the list goes on if we didn’t modify the plants ourselves. Starvation and poverty would also be much much worse.

    From everything I have seen and heard from food preparation side all pesticides don’t affect humans. Most gets washed off or cooked and things made to affect RNA doesn’t often affect DNA if a weed killer and bug killers typically don’t harm us unless your out spraying it all over your body all day. Petroleum if used in them could kill you if so in that case, which I do know a bit about.

    With your sheep, what kills a parasite like weeds and bugs doesn’t mean it kills a human. We humans can take medicine to kill parasites inside us and be perfectly fine. If you eat sheep hopefully you are cooking it out anyways and the body will likely dispose of it since it doesn’t have any need for it. They probably don’t use pesticides on their animals there. My local cattle nearby and farmer I know doesn’t use them unless they need to. Little different setup close by than normal though.

    Reply

    Joyce Ann you are clearly not over burdened with intellect or education. I get paid nothing from Monsanto nor am affiliated to them in any way. I do know someone in food safety with the Government and many health codes and am in the business of knowing about food.

    I actually have even said negative things about Monsanto, specifically their seed licensing. I am talking pesticides originally which many companies make. Also more than one companies make GMO’s. I have a friend that works as an engineer for a completely different company. I know the basics on how these things are tested and are safe.

    Reply

That is hardly the only thing Monsanto needs to worry about. If we ever get a really honest Justice department and EPA in the very near future a number of corporations need to be prepared for all the investigations and law suits they are going to face and the number of their administrators who are going to spend years in jail for what they have done to people and the environment. I’m hopping a number of Republican politicians get smart and retire this year before they go down with the rest.

Reply

Protest January 20. Find a march near you or get to DC

Reply

Time to take all their assets and sell them off to help those effected.

Reply

Motherfucking murderers

Reply

How many people could have been saved?

Reply

They should be sued and the FDA should have never approved of this ingredient. Shame on them both

Reply

no surprise there

Reply

Wow. A company that lied. Scrape me off the floor and call me a pancake….who’d a thunk it.

Reply

What a surprise! Not! Corporate Amerikka is happy to poison and kill you for profit, and the courts and politicians support and protect them. Suckers, you are fodder for the rich, who have no humanity at all, none.

Reply

No surprise,Monsanto is the worst ever!

Reply

That point where you realize, the tinfoil hat crew were right all along, and you go back to pretending it isnt true, but you cannot unknow a thing, and it will eat at the back of your brain.. making you question things more. Best to just challenge everything you know now in stages, while you can, before it becomes one big avalance of fuckery, overwelms you and you end up in fetal position in your bed wondering where it all went wrong.. lol. but seriously.. time to plant organic heirloom seed gardens folks..if you dont have a yard, find someone elses land and do it. Get out of the cities if you can, its gonna get wierd soon.

Reply

Of course they did

Reply

If corporations are poeple under the law, that one needs to be charged for reckless diregard for life or attempted murder.

Reply

Why is it a bombshell? We know monsatan is evil to the core.

Reply

Nothing surprises me about Monsanto.
They’re one of the worst things to ever happen to the entire agricultural community.
I have no doubt about it.

Reply

Yeahhh but how are we going to get rid of all those terrible weeds… If we don’t give the population of the world cancer… As well. It’s a real conundrum

Reply

Here eat this . Don’t talk with your mouth full of shit ;).

Reply

Murders and killers

Reply

Get used to it, YOU are expendable.

Reply

When is Ecosnippits going to stop putting out old false information and pretending it’s TRUE?

Reply

    I don’t know, sad that they are on the generally right side of things but in the specifics go off the rails and insist on using fake facts and conspiracy theories.

    That kind of ‘reasoning’ is what got Trump elected and keeps the Republicans going at all.

    I can only assume most people here are appalled by the direction Trump and the Republicans take things (especially environmentally) so I really can’t understand supporting the use of the same ‘alternative facts’ type tactics!

    There are plenty of real things to worry about in this sphere to not need to resort to this. This kind of thing unnecessarily puts the environmental agenda, that they rightly want to push, at risk of ridicule!

    Reply

    Rob Sampson couldn’t agree more. Thanks

    Reply

Sue the fuck out of Monsanto!

Reply

It’s not exactly a surprise!!!

Reply

I wonder what they know about 1080?

Reply

No surprise at ALL for Monsanto!

Reply

    Guy Wagner you do realize these guys have been producing quack research for years.

    Reply

A product often recommended by the US Agriculture and Forestry services. Does the fault lie in our education system? All bow to the Great Green Dollar God!

Reply

    Charlie Biel products perfectly fine. It’s the falsehoods coming from garbage blogs like Ecosnippets are to blame.

    Reply

I love how Ecosnippets constantly regurgitates the same BS. Bother researchers have been peer reviewed has quacks. Not one of there research journals have panned out on any typic. Plus Ecosnippets constantly forget to update their data from the WHO. The newest research and listing from the EU and WHO 2017 shows no link to any type of cancer.
Ecosnippets please hire some real journalists that know how to do a little bit of research. It would be refreshing.

Reply

Monsanto was spraying the early version of agent orange on Korea during the Korean “police action” (war) and already knew the effects it had on the population even back then. they are a bunch of psychopaths.

Reply

The research of the scientists mentioned in the article is about as reliable as Andrew Wakefield when it comes to autism. The WHO declared glyphosate a possible carcinogen AGAINST the scientific consensus & it’s definitely safer than the alternatives that farmers are now being forced to use due to bans.

Reply

    The shill claimers and antiGMO people will be along shortly. You’re still right though.

    Reply

    Nice try trolls.

    Reply

    Yeah you’re right.. the organizations and individuals who were paid by Monsanto didn’t reach a consensus with any other study.. but the rest of the scientific community does agree that its a carcinogen. Its not safer then other available products, it’s just cheaper.

    Reply

    There are other Available ways to control pests and that is and always has been adopting Better FARMING practices, from Planting, to diversification of ‘SISTER’ plants / flowers / herbs, to using ducks or chickens, to even installing (Classical) Music. Keeping a healthy crop also deters the bad bugs. Again, it takes more labor; but your crops; your livestock, you and your neighbors and all the folks that eat your produce BENEFIT from adhereing to healthy farming practices.

    Reply

    Matt Witt *sigh* the criteria that the WHO used to classify glyphosate & spark bans would also apply to drinking coffee, using tartar control toothpaste, most soaps & detergents, etc…there are various levels of carcinogens (sunlight is a much more deadly carcinogen FYI). *SMH* too for the “but only the bad guy corporate scientists say its safe” which is a total lie, but it fits your narrative so why bother with the truth eh? It is much safer than the pesticides that farmers now use because it is banned, & no Georgann Putintsev you can’t produce enough food to feed the planet with “good farming practices” – they help, but you still loose between 30-50 % of your crop yield to pests.

    Reply

    Karrilyn McPhee Yes. So right. Look what happened with DDT, also banned due to public opinion not science. DDT had almost eradicated malaria. Yes, in massive doses it causes cancer, but many “natural” substances do too. It is popular to go after big “bad” corporations and their “deep pockets”, forgetting that these companies have shareholders and are made of everyday employees like us.

    Reply

    Karrilyn McPhee Enough food to feed the planet? We already produce enough grain for 10 billion people (look it up if you don’t believe it). Lets not forget about all of the overconsumption and food waste. Plenty of farmers have lots of success without pecticides or GMO’s. One rarely mentioned problem with typcial farming practices too is the fact that petro fertalizers and almost all pesticides kill benfical life in the soil thus destabilizing it, causing topsoil errosion and eventually desertification…not exactly a good long term strategy …most definitly terrible stewardship for future generations.

    Reply

    Kye Kendall just because the first world wastes food doesn’t mean the rest of the world isn’t going hungry. (& I defy you to feed the planet on grain alone, hence the need for things like golden rice.) Most desertification is due to climate change & lack of irrigation water (like in Imperial Vally CF where we turned a desert into farmland by taking so much water out of the rivers that a portion of Mexico’s agriculture collapsed.)

    Reply

    Karrilyn McPhee I’m well aware how much the rest of the world is going hungry thanks. And yes grain alone is not going to fix malnutrition within a population, however it does have a long shelf life and can provide some relief to starving people. My point is that these companies claiming that their technology is going to “feed the world” are more concerned about their bottom line than actually helping poorer nations. People starve because they are either dirt poor or live in a food dessert (or both). If these companies can develop a crop that is more nutritious or more drought resistant than all the more power to them (few would be against such a scientific advancement if the safty was proven in a reliable and trustworthy manner). Lets be honest though, while the drought resistance and nutrition boosting crops are in developmental stages we have an industry that almost exclusivly uses questionable “roundup ready” GMO technology strictly for the economic value it provides to richer people and richer nations. There can be (and even is) some economic value to poor nations as well however the economic situaition of the world is typically a scenario where the rich exploit the poor, whether that is a rich country exploiting a poor country, or some rich people exploiting a group of poor people within their own country etc etc. This is documented in countless instances and occasions. If any one, or any company for that matter, really cared about feeding the world than one of the first things that should be adressed is the socio and econmic problems that creat such inequality. Technology is great but it can’t fix explotation and greed.

    Reply

    Karrilyn McPhee Also saying that most desrtification is caused by climate change and lack of irrigation ignores the fact that our agrigultural and forestry practices perpetuate climate change. If you look into the causes of desertification, agricultural use is in the top 4, yes along with climate change however once again they unfortunately complement each other. When it comes to irrigation it can be noted that good stewardship of soil literally creates a topsoil that retains water and nutrients with superior efficiency – meaning crops need signifiganlty less irrigaition. Your example of Imperial Valley only highlights the explotation and overconsumption issue does it not? We use another nations water recsources to produce crops that end up getting wasted or overconsumed. While also growing said crops with agrigultural technology that wasts water…All because it fits best with an economic model that could give two shits about the problems of poverty and climate change.

    Reply

Of course they did. Same thing with agent orange.

Reply

Of course they did

Reply

…of course they did. ?

Reply

All industry know about the danger the only think is they paying scientists lots off money to deny it…

Reply

Same with tobacco in the 50s and meat & animal products today

Reply

Monsanto, was promoted & pushed through the FDA by then V.P. George Bush, Sr. after he toured the facility. Of course, the past hisotry of Monsanto’s origins and Agent Orange … and Nazi connections didn’t hinder him moving it forward. Whenever, I heard him speak about a New World Order, I knew exactly what he meant; especially when “Right to Work” States started popping up in Republican States. We needed to have Nuremburg trials here against the Elite American Nazi’s and to abolish the C.I.A. too.

Reply

People should be sent to prison and the company needs to be closed, all their assets sold to pay for peoples’ medical costs.

Reply

Burn them, burn them all.

Reply

any one been procueted yet

Reply

We’ve been talking about it for 40 so yeah.

Reply

We all need more glyphosate in our diet. ?

Reply

Guess who the Gov paid to test the safety of lead additives? Guess who the Gov paid to test the safety of cigarettes? ?

Reply

That’s not a bombshell

Reply

Not a bombshell, too much money too be made, bit like the tobacco companies

Reply

Really and this is a surprise

Reply

The only bombshell is that consumers happily spend money on and eat the produce grown with glyphosate.. yum yum
Ignorance is

Reply

Well of course they knew….

Reply

We are not surprised.

Reply

“Samsel was recently able to get a look inside a file, sealed away since 1981 as a “Trade Secret” at the request of the Monsanto Company due to his field of study”. Which entity allowed Monsanto to file the report as a “trade secret”?

Reply

How old is this article? Monsanto don’t exist anymore.

Reply

    David Naylor Monsanto still exist, alive and kicking, still making millions in Africa selling their Glyphosate, otherwise known as “Roundup” in Africa.

    Reply

    Abdullah Abram Molefe ok. So is this article recent? Since they were taken over by Bayer?

    Reply

Ah, a secret file that someone showed him but vowed him to secrecy; always a reliable source.?

Reply

Same as it ever was

Reply

Premeditated cancer.

Reply

they are a chemical weapons company primarily, just likd Dow and the others..

Reply

If true, prosecutions needed.

Reply

When will humans realize that profit does not outweigh safety in the environment?

Reply

I imagine Bayer is going to go after someone from Monsanto as well.

Reply

They have brilliant scientists. Of course they knew. And of course it was so good at killing green things that it didn’t matter if humans suffered. Profit over humans is the capitalism creed.

Reply

Those docs have been known but have been hidden!

Reply

In 1964 I earned a B.S. degree in Business. I never went into business because I had become very disillusioned even then with prevalent attitudes in business. By 1970 Exxon knew that burning fossil fuels was leading to global warming. They took the path of lying and deceit and kept collecting profits. By around 1984 Monsanto knew they were producing a chemical linked to caner but they kept marketing it for profits. Unregulated capitalism has led to lying, cheating, and stealing without penalties. The executives involved no longer have much of a conscious if they ever really had one. I left business school upset that I heard little or nothing about QUALITY and LIFE TIME ENGINEERING. Instead it was about COSTS and PROFITS FOR STOCKHOLDERS AND C.E.O.’s. It was in the 60’s that you began to really see the decline in quality and the drive to force the consumer to replace the item (conspicuous consumption) and have a dealer work on it because it was no longer purposely user friendly as the old time products were. Even my mechanic now has to invest in software, etc. each year to be able to work on cars that are now electrical time bombs waiting to blow out.

Reply

Why is anyone surprised? Corporations have been covering up and lying about carcinogens forever, since day one. And they are not going to stop unless they are forced to stop. That’s just the way it is.

Reply
Add Your Reply

Leave a Comment: